SEH RECOMIENDA: ๐ฌ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. ๐ฏ๐๐๐๐, ๐ฏ๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐๐๐๐. ๐บ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ท๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ท๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ (๐ต๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ท๐๐๐๐ 2022), escrito por ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ ๐จ๐ซ๐ (๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ก๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ง๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ).
๐ฌ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. ๐ฏ๐๐๐๐, ๐ฏ๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐๐๐๐. ๐บ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ท๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ท๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ (๐ต๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ท๐๐๐๐ 2022), escrito por ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ ๐จ๐ซ๐ (๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ก๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ง๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ).
๐๐๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ง: โDespite the wide reception Gilles Deleuze has received across the humanities, research on his early work has remained scant. Experience and Empiricism remedies that gap with a detailed study of Deleuzeโs first book, Empiricism and Subjectivity, which is devoted to the philosophical project of David Hume. Russell Ford argues that this work is poorly understood when read simply as a stand-alone study on Hume. Its significance only becomes apparent within the context of a larger problematic that dominated, and continues to inform, modern European philosophy: the conceptual constitution of a purely immanent account of existence. While the importance of this debate is recognized in contemporary scholarship, its genealogy โincluding Deleuzeโs place within itโ has been underappreciated. This book shows how Deleuze directly engages in an ongoing debate between his teachers Jean Wahl and Jean Hyppolite over experience and empiricism, an intervention that restages the famous encounter between rationalism and empiricism that yielded Kantโs critical philosophy. What, Deleuze effectively asks, might have happened had Hume been the one roused from his empirical dogmatic slumber by the rationalist challenge of Kant?โ.
๐๐ง๐ฅ๐๐๐: https://nupress.northwestern.edu/…/experience-and…/
